Jaguar XF (X250)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8vsLexus LS IV · Facelift 2009 460 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LS IV · Facelift 2009
460 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque515 Nm380 lb-ft
- Lightest1,780 kg3,924 lb
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score77/100
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range757 km470 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 515Nm380lb-ft | 493Nm364lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Gross weight | 2,285kg5,038lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 631km392mi Calculated | 757km470mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 4,608cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,961mm195in | 5,060mm199in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,875mm74in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 2,970mm117in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,620mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 923L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 84L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 has 4 hp more than Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 493 Nm 364 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 5.7 s |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 5.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 631 km 392 mi |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 757 km 470 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8 | LexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 515 Nm 380 lb-ft | 493 Nm 364 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 631 km 392 mi | 757 km 470 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8 | Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) 5.0 V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 22 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2009 460 V8
- Has 126 km (78 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























