Car comparison

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S80

2.8 24V T6

272 hp2783 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan1998-2001
VS

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V

2.0

280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1998-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    383 Nm
    282 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,260 kg
    2,778 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    222 hp/t
    166 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS802.8 24V T6MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
272hp203kW
280hp209kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
383Nm282lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,260kg2,778lb
Gross weight
2,210kg4,872lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
39.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
22.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
645km401mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,783cc170cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,822mm190in
4,350mm171in
Width
1,832mm72in
1,770mm70in
Height
1,434mm56in
1,415mm56in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,510mm99in
Front track
1,562mm61in
1,510mm59in
Rear track
1,560mm61in
1,505mm59in
Trunk volume
440L
-
Max trunk volume
1,106L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS802.8 24V T65,400 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm5,650 rpm
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.06,500 rpm3,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS802.8 24V T6MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.4 s
16.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
182 km/h
113 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
272 hp
203 kW
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
280 hp
209 kW

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 has 8 hp more than Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
383 Nm
282 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
1,260 kg
2,778 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T67.2 s
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.04.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 and Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: 2.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
222 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
272 hp
203 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
280 hp
209 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS802.8 24V T6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in
MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS802.8 24V T6MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
Power
272 hp
203 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
383 Nm
282 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,260 kg
2,778 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,822 mm
189.8 in
Height
1,434 mm
56.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Range score
645 km
401 mi
-
Trunk score
440 L
15.5 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
222 hp/t
166 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S80 2.8 24V T6
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6

  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 3 Nm more
  • Is 370 kg lighter
  • Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster