Volvo S80
Car comparison
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6vsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution V
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,260 kg2,778 lb
- Best power-to-weight222 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 39.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 645km401mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,783cc170cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,822mm190in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,562mm61in | 1,510mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,106L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 5,400 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.4 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 has 8 hp more than Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 7.2 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0 and Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6: 2.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS802.8 24V T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS802.8 24V T6 | MitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 645 km 401 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution V 2.0
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 3 Nm more
- Is 370 kg lighter
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























