Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TDIvsMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi ASX II
1.3 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,190 km740 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Most powerful158 hp118 kW
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk536 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 158hp118kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,345kg2,965lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,834kg4,043lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 76.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 60.9s Calculated | 64.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,190km740mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,227mm166in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,797mm71in |
| Height | 1,584mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,639mm104in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 161mm6in | 174mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 536L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | 1,275L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 60.9 s | 64.0 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 158 hp 118 kW |
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo has 8 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 1,190 km 740 mi |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 158 hp 118 kW | 8.5 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 158 hp 118 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,190 km 740 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 536 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI | Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 377 km (234 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























