Mitsubishi ASX II
Car comparison
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurbovsRenault Duster II · Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Duster II · Facelift 2024
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Largest trunk536 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe
- Most powerful162 hp121 kW
- Lightest1,341 kg2,956 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 158hp118kW | 162hp121kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,345kg2,965lb | 1,341kg2,956lb |
| Gross weight | 1,834kg4,043lb | 1,853kg4,085lb |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.5s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 63.9s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 814km506mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,333cc81cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,227mm166in | 4,376mm172in |
| Width | 1,797mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,585mm62in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,639mm104in | 2,673mm105in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 174mm7in | 237mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 536L | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,275L | 1,478L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 46L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 63.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 136 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 158 hp 118 kW |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 162 hp 121 kW |
Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe has 4 hp more than Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 1,341 kg 2,956 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 8.5 s |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 9.2 s |
Although Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe has more power, Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 158 hp 118 kW | 8.5 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 162 hp 121 kW | 9.2 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 158 hp 118 kW | 162 hp 121 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | 1,341 kg 2,956 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 814 km 506 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 536 L 18.9 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 61 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 4 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























