Mini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0vsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,240 kg2,734 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions110 g/km
- Best estimated range1,048 km651 mi
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best practicality score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,240kg2,734lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 37.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,048km651mi Calculated | 783km487mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,850mm152in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 110g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 37.8 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 20 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.2 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.4 s |
Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,048 km 651 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 783 km 487 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.2 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,048 km 651 mi | 783 km 487 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 110 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 119 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























