Mini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0vsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 8-speed
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Largest trunk211 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 6-speed
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions104 g/km
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Best economy score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,240kg2,734lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 73.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,048km651mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,850mm152in | 3,821mm150in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 211L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 110g/km | 104g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 8-speed: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 6-speed: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 170 hp 127 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 7.2 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 7.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 1,048 km 651 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.2 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.2 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 6-speed is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.08-speed | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.06-speed | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,048 km 651 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 110 g/km | 104 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 8-speed | Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 6-speed |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper SD 2.0 8-speed
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 6-speed
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























