Skoda Octavia III
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSIvsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,175 kg2,590 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions106 g/km
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score96/100
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,245kg2,745lb | 1,175kg2,590lb |
| Gross weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.4s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 820km509mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,659mm183in | 3,821mm150in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 141g/km | 106g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.4 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI has 10 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 1,245 kg 2,745 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 7.3 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.3 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.3 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,245 kg 2,745 lb | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 820 km 509 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 141 g/km | 106 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI | Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 7.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,050 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 379 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 280 km (174 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 35 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























