AUDI A3 Sportback (8V)
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions110 g/km
- Best estimated range1,190 km740 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lightest1,245 kg2,745 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,315kg2,899lb | 1,245kg2,745lb |
| Gross weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 81.2s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.7s Calculated | 30.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,190km740mi Calculated | 820km509mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,310mm170in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,220L | 1,580L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 110g/km | 141g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.7 s | 30.5 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI and AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 1,245 kg 2,745 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 7.3 s |
Although AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI has more power, Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI and AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,190 km 740 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.3 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | 1,245 kg 2,745 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,190 km 740 mi | 820 km 509 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 110 g/km | 141 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI | Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 371 km (230 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 31 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























