Mini Hatch (F56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0vsMini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (R56)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions106 g/km
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk211 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,165 kg2,568 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,175kg2,590lb | 1,165kg2,568lb |
| Gross weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,821mm150in | 3,729mm147in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,407mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 680L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 106g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 has 14 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.3 s |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.3 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.0 L/100 km 58.8 mpg US 70.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 106 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 | Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.00 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.27 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 600 L159 US gal132 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,050 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 319 km (198 mi) more estimated range
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
- Emits 43 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























