Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0vsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F55)

Cooper SD 2.0

170 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

Cooper S 1.6

190 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,230 kg
    2,712 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.8 L/100 km
    61.9 mpg US
    74.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    112 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,023 km
    636 mi
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
170hp127kW
190hp142kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,230kg2,712lb
1,305kg2,877lb
Gross weight
1,755kg3,869lb
1,775kg3,913lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
76.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
81.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
33.2s
Calculated
37.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,023km636mi
Calculated
783km487mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,005mm158in
4,114mm162in
Width
1,727mm68in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,518mm60in
Wheelbase
2,567mm101in
2,595mm102in
Front track
1,501mm59in
1,531mm60in
Rear track
1,501mm59in
1,558mm61in
Ground clearance
146mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
278L
330L
Max trunk volume
941L
1,080L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
44L
47L
CO2 emissions
112g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.65,500-6,500 rpm1,700-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.2 s
37.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 20 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
1,230 kg
2,712 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
1,305 kg
2,877 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.07.4 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.67.4 s

Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
1,023 km
636 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
783 km
487 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
7.4 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
170 hp
127 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,230 kg
2,712 lb
1,305 kg
2,877 lb
Fuel consumption
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in
Range score
1,023 km
636 mi
783 km
487 mi
CO2 score
112 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
278 L
9.8 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.52 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.11 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used645 L170 US gal142 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,129 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 240 km (149 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 27 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 52 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper C 1.5
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper C 1.5
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster