Mini Hatch (F55)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0vsMini Hatch (F66) Cooper C 1.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F66)
Cooper C 1.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,230kg2,712lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,023km636mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,005mm158in | 3,876mm153in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,432mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,567mm101in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,501mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,501mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | 146mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 210L |
| Max trunk volume | 941L | 725L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 112g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 has 14 hp more than Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper C 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper C 1.5 and Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper C 1.5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper C 1.5: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 7.7 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | MiniHatch (F66)Cooper C 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,023 km 636 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 112 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 | Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mini Hatch (F66) Cooper C 1.5
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























