Mini Hatch (F55)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0vsAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo MiTo · Facelift 2016
1.4 TB MultiAir
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,023 km636 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir
- Lightest1,170 kg2,579 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,230kg2,712lb | 1,170kg2,579lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 35.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,023km636mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,368cc83cu in |
| Length | 4,005mm158in | 4,063mm160in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,720mm68in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,446mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,567mm101in | 2,511mm99in |
| Front track | 1,501mm59in | 1,475mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,501mm59in | 1,469mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 146mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 941L | 950L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 112g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 35.6 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,023 km 636 mi |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa RomeoMiToFacelift 20161.4 TB MultiAir | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | 1,170 kg 2,579 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,023 km 636 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 112 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 | Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo MiTo Facelift 2016 1.4 TB MultiAir
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























