Mini Hatch (F65)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,023 km636 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.3s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 76.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.4s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 1,023km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,036mm159in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,464mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,567mm101in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 925L | 941L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 112g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.4 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 has 34 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 647 km 402 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,023 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.8 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 1,023 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 112 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 34 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 376 km (234 mi) more estimated range
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























