Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0vsNissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024
1.3 DIG-T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score94/100
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
- Most powerful158 hp118 kW
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk504 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 158hp118kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.7s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 197 km/h / 122 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 58.5s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 938km583mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,665mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,596mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 504L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,447L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: Power / Torque
- Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 58.5 s | - |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW |
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T has 8 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 199 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 8.5 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 9.2 s |
Although Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T has more power, Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 938 km 583 mi |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 158 hp 118 kW | 9.2 s | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 158 hp 118 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 938 km 583 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 504 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 | Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 78 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























