Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0vsSubaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

JCW 2.0

231 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016

Sport 2.0 T

240 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,555 kg
    3,428 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    739 km
    459 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
231hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,555kg3,428lb
1,624kg3,580lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
72.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
79.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
26.8s
Calculated
36.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
739km459mi
Calculated
706km439mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,595mm181in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,735mm68in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,640mm104in
Front track
1,565mm62in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,567mm62in
1,555mm61in
Ground clearance-
220mm9in
Trunk volume
450L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
197g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 TPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,450-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T5,600 rpm2,400-3,600 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.8 s
36.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW

Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T has 9 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
1,624 kg
3,580 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.06.5 s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T7.5 s

Although Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T has more power, Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
739 km
459 mi
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
706 km
439 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
6.5 s
234 km/h
145 mph
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
240 hp
179 kW
7.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
6.5 s
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
Power
231 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,555 kg
3,428 lb
1,624 kg
3,580 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,595 mm
180.9 in
Height
1,735 mm
68.3 in
Range score
739 km
459 mi
706 km
439 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
197 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0Subaru Forester IV Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Is 69 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 39 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
Subaru Forester IV Sport 2.0 T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

JCW 2.0
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014JCW 1.6
Sport 2.0 T
2.0
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IV2.0
JCW 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester IIIFacelift 20102.5 Turbo
JCW 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 XT
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester III2.5 XT
JCW 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
Sport 2.0 T
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
JCW 2.0
25d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)25d
Sport 2.0 T
2.0d
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
JCW 2.0
25i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)25i
Sport 2.0 T
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 TvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 vs Subaru Forester IV · Facelift 2016 Sport 2.0 T - car comparison - FastVsFaster