Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,041 km647 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,041km647mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 130g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,041 km 647 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,041 km 647 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 130 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 232 km (144 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























