Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0vsVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan III
1.5 eTSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h9.0 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight96 hp/t71 kW/t10.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,616kg3,563lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.4s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.3s Calculated | 56.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,297mm169in | 4,539mm179in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,859mm73in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,676mm105in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 652L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.3 s | 56.0 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 9.0 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0 | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper D 2.0
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 46 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 203 km (126 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Has 202 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























