Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

2.0d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,405 kg
    3,097 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,245 km
    774 mi
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,405kg3,097lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
75.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
68.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
31.9s
Calculated
30.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,245km774mi
Calculated
1,091km678mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,856mm191in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
148mm6in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
660L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
48L
CO2 emissions-
117g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.9 s
30.8 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,405 kg
3,097 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
228 km/h
142 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI7.7 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
1,245 km
774 mi
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,091 km
678 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
228 km/h
142 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.7 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.4 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,245 km
774 mi
1,091 km
678 mi
CO2 score
-
117 g/km
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km7.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi12.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal660 L174 US gal145 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,155 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI

  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 154 km (96 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 300 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0d
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
2.0d
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
2.0 TDI
520d
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
2.0 TDI
CLS 250 BlueTEC
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 250 BlueTEC
2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI vs Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster