BMW 5 Series Touring (G31)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520dvsSkoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III Combi
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 1,245km774mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,942mm195in | 4,856mm191in |
| Width | 1,868mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,975mm117in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 148mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 660L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,950L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 7.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,245 km 774 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 1,245 km 774 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























