Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIvsMG MG7 II 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboLiftback / fastback2017-2018
VS

MG MG7 II

2.0T

261 hp1986 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,119 km
    695 mi
  • Largest trunk
    563 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

MG MG7 II 2.0T

  • Most powerful
    261 hp
    195 kW
  • Lightest
    1,650 kg
    3,638 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIMGMG7 II2.0T
Power
240hp179kW
261hp195kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
405Nm299lb-ft
Curb weight
1,828kg4,030lb
1,650kg3,638lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
2,085kg4,597lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
113.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
99.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
30.5s
Calculated
29.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.9L/100 km33.9mpg US40.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,119km695mi
Calculated
937km582mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,986cc121cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,884mm192in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,889mm74in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,447mm57in
Wheelbase
2,837mm112in
2,778mm109in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,581mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
-
Trunk volume
563L
375L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
65L
CO2 emissions
152g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIMG MG7 II 2.0TPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • MG MG7 II 2.0T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MGMG7 II2.0T5,500-6,000 rpm1,750-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIMGMG7 II2.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.5 s
29.9 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
MGMG7 II2.0T
261 hp
195 kW

MG MG7 II 2.0T has 21 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and MG MG7 II 2.0T: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
MGMG7 II2.0T
405 Nm
299 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
1,828 kg
4,030 lb
MGMG7 II2.0T
1,650 kg
3,638 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
245 km/h
152 mph
MGMG7 II2.0T
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI6.5 s
MGMG7 II2.0T6.5 s

Although MG MG7 II 2.0T has more power, Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MGMG7 II2.0T
6.9 L/100 km
33.9 mpg US
40.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and MG MG7 II 2.0T: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
MGMG7 II2.0T
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
1,119 km
695 mi
MGMG7 II2.0T
937 km
582 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
245 km/h
152 mph
MGMG7 II2.0T
261 hp
195 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
MGMG7 II2.0T
Power
261 hp
195 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
375 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
4,884 mm
192.3 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MGMG7 II2.0T
Power
261 hp
195 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.9 L/100 km
33.9 mpg US
40.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.5 s
MGMG7 II2.0T
6.9 L/100 km
33.9 mpg US
40.7 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MGMG7 II2.0T
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
33.9 mpg US
40.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIMGMG7 II2.0T
Power
240 hp
179 kW
261 hp
195 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
405 Nm
299 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,828 kg
4,030 lb
1,650 kg
3,638 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
33.9 mpg US
40.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
375 L
13.2 cu ft
Length
4,884 mm
192.3 in
Height
1,447 mm
57.0 in
Range score
1,119 km
695 mi
937 km
582 mi
CO2 score
152 g/km
-
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
375 L
13.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIMG MG7 II 2.0T
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km33.9 mpg US40.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km12.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi19.55 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal1,041 L275 US gal229 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,822 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 95 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 188 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

MG MG7 II 2.0T

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Is 178 kg lighter
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
MG MG7 II 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
MGMG7 II2.0TvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
MGMG7 II2.0TvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201945 TFSI
2.0T
45 TFSI
VS
MGMG7 II2.0TvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI
2.0 BiTDI
3.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)3.0 TDI
2.0T
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
MGMG7 II2.0TvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 BiTDI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0T
2.0 TSI
VS
MGMG7 II2.0TvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0T
76 kWh
VS
MGMG7 II2.0TvsAUDIE5 Sportback76 kWh
2.0 BiTDI
60 60 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI vs MG MG7 II 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster