MG MG7 II
Car comparison
MG MG7 II 2.0TvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
MG MG7 II 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score88/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MGMG7 II2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 261hp195kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 405Nm299lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 99.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.9s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km33.9mpg US40.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 937km582mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,986cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,884mm192in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,889mm74in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,447mm57in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,778mm109in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,597mm63in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 375L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MGMG7 II2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.9 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 31 hp more than MG MG7 II 2.0T.
The biggest power difference is between MG MG7 II 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, MG MG7 II 2.0T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG MG7 II 2.0T and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T | 261 hp 195 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGMG7 II2.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MGMG7 II2.0T | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 261 hp 195 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 405 Nm 299 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 33.9 mpg US 40.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 937 km 582 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 375 L 13.2 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | MG MG7 II 2.0T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km33.9 mpg US40.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,041 L275 US gal229 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,822 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
MG MG7 II 2.0T
- Is 665 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Has 235 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























