Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8vsMG Cyberster 77 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016

AMG SL 63 V8

571 hp5461 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboRoadster2018-2019
VS

MG Cyberster

77 kWh

510 hpElectricAWDAutomaticRoadster2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    571 hp
    426 kW
  • Highest torque
    900 Nm
    664 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    323 hp/t
    241 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    504 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    86/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    32/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
571hp426kW
510hp380kW
Torque
900Nm664lb-ft
725Nm535lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,985kg4,376lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
49.4s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
32.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.1s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
13.1s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.9s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
323hp/t241kW/t146hp/1000 lb
Calculated
257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
508Nm/t340lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
641km398mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
5,461cc333cu in
-
Length
4,633mm182in
4,535mm179in
Width
1,877mm74in
1,913mm75in
Height
1,300mm51in
1,329mm52in
Wheelbase
2,585mm102in
2,690mm106in
Trunk volume-
249L
Max trunk volume
504L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
75L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8MGCyberster77 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.9 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.1 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.1 s
15.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
193 km/h
120 mph
186 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8
571 hp
426 kW
MGCyberster77 kWh
510 hp
380 kW

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8 has 61 hp more than MG Cyberster 77 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8: 61 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
MGCyberster77 kWh
725 Nm
535 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
MGCyberster77 kWh
1,985 kg
4,376 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MGCyberster77 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V84.1 s
MGCyberster77 kWh3.2 s

Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8 has more power, MG Cyberster 77 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
MGCyberster77 kWh
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8
571 hp
426 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MGCyberster77 kWh
510 hp
380 kW
3.2 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8
Power
571 hp
426 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
571 hp
426 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
725 Nm
535 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.1 s
3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,985 kg
4,376 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
504 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,300 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in
Range score
641 km
398 mi
-
Trunk score
504 L
17.8 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
323 hp/t
241 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8

  • Has 61 hp more
  • Has 175 Nm more
  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 255 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

MG Cyberster 77 kWh

  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63 V8
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG SL 63 V8
AMG SL 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
77 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsAston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8
AMG SL 63 V8
AMG SL 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
AMG SL 63 V8
AMG SL 65 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 V12
77 kWh
SL 500 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 500 V8
AMG SL 63 V8
AMG SL 65 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2006AMG SL 65 V12
77 kWh
S 4.0 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
AMG SL 63 V8
AMG SL 65 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)AMG SL 65 V12
77 kWh
3.0 V6
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMcLarenArtura Spider3.0 V6
AMG SL 63 V8
AMG SL 73 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12
77 kWh
M40i
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsBMWZ4 (G29 LCI)Facelift 2022M40i
AMG SL 63 V8
SL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016 AMG SL 63 V8 vs MG Cyberster 77 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster