Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8vsMG Cyberster 77 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)

S 4.0 V8

522 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboRoadster2017-2021
VS

MG Cyberster

77 kWh

510 hpElectricAWDAutomaticRoadster2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    308 km/h
    191 mph
  • Most powerful
    522 hp
    389 kW
  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    321 hp/t
    240 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100

MG Cyberster 77 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.2 s
  • Highest torque
    725 Nm
    535 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    249 L
  • Best practicality score
    31/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
522hp389kW
510hp380kW
Torque
670Nm494lb-ft
725Nm535lb-ft
Curb weight
1,625kg3,583lb
1,985kg4,376lb
Gross weight
1,940kg4,277lb
-
Top speed
308 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.8s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph
Calculated
32.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
11.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
321hp/t240kW/t146hp/1000 lb
Calculated
257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
565km351mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
-
Length
4,551mm179in
4,535mm179in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,913mm75in
Height
1,260mm50in
1,329mm52in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,678mm66in
-
Ground clearance
96mm4in
-
Trunk volume
165L
249L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
65L
-
CO2 emissions
262g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8MGCyberster77 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.3 s
15.3 s
Top speed
308 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
203 km/h
126 mph
186 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
522 hp
389 kW
MGCyberster77 kWh
510 hp
380 kW

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 has 12 hp more than MG Cyberster 77 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
670 Nm
494 lb-ft
MGCyberster77 kWh
725 Nm
535 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
MGCyberster77 kWh
1,985 kg
4,376 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
308 km/h
191 mph
MGCyberster77 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V83.8 s
MGCyberster77 kWh3.2 s

Although Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 has more power, MG Cyberster 77 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
321 hp/t
240 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
MGCyberster77 kWh
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
522 hp
389 kW
3.8 s
308 km/h
191 mph
MGCyberster77 kWh
510 hp
380 kW
3.2 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
Power
522 hp
389 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
308 km/h
191 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
165 L
5.8 cu ft
Length
4,551 mm
179.2 in
Height
1,260 mm
49.6 in
MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
522 hp
389 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
670 Nm
494 lb-ft
725 Nm
535 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
3.2 s
Top speed
308 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
1,985 kg
4,376 lb
Fuel consumption
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
165 L
5.8 cu ft
Length
4,551 mm
179.2 in
Height
1,260 mm
49.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in
Range score
565 km
351 mi
-
CO2 score
262 g/km
-
Trunk score
165 L
5.8 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
321 hp/t
240 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
Consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Is 360 kg lighter
  • Has 88 km/h (55 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

MG Cyberster 77 kWh

  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 84 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8
77 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsAston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
77 kWh
AMG SL 55 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8
S 4.0 V8
63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
77 kWh
SL 500 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 500 V8
77 kWh
3.0 V6
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMcLarenArtura Spider3.0 V6
77 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
AMG SL 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
77 kWh
M40i
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsBMWZ4 (G29 LCI)Facelift 2022M40i
S 4.0 V8
FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Roadster (R197)FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
77 kWh
Grand sport 6.2 V8
VS
MGCyberster77 kWhvsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Grand sport 6.2 V8
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) S 4.0 V8 vs MG Cyberster 77 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster