Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8vsMG Cyberster 77 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMG Cyberster
77 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed302 km/h188 mph
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight298 hp/t223 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score82/100
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque725 Nm535 lb-ft
- Largest trunk249 L
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | MGCyberster77 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 725Nm535lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 32.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 298hp/t223kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,913mm75in |
| Height | 1,259mm50in | 1,329mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 165L | 249L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | MGCyberster77 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 510 hp 380 kW |
MG Cyberster 77 kWh has 34 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 and MG Cyberster 77 kWh: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MGCyberster77 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | MGCyberster77 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | 249 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Is 390 kg lighter
- Has 82 km/h (51 mph) higher top speed
- Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 95 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 84 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























