Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
4.0 V8
510 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboRoadster2020-2024
Car comparison
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8vsMG Cyberster 77 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
MG Cyberster
77 kWh
510 hpElectricAWDAutomaticRoadster2024-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Lightest1,628 kg3,589 lb
- Best power-to-weight313 hp/t234 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score32/100
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Highest torque725 Nm535 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | MGCyberster77 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 685Nm505lb-ft | 725Nm535lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,628kg3,589lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.7s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 32.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 313hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 646km401mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,465mm176in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,942mm76in | 1,913mm75in |
| Height | 1,273mm50in | 1,329mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,704mm106in | 2,690mm106in |
| Trunk volume | - | 249L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | MGCyberster77 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 15.3 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 186 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 510 hp 380 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| MGCyberster77 kWh | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MGCyberster77 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8 | MGCyberster77 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,628 kg 3,589 lb | 1,985 kg 4,376 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 646 km 401 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 249 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 313 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
- Is 357 kg lighter
- Has 86 km/h (53 mph) higher top speed
- Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.0 V8
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 55 V8
Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8
MGCyberster77 kWhvsAston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8
Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 500 V8
Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 VantageFacelift 20244.0 V8
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 VantageFacelift 2008S 4.7 V8
MGCyberster77 kWhvsMcLarenArtura Spider3.0 V6
Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.0 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage (II)5.3 i V8 32V
MGCyberster77 kWhvsBMWZ4 (G29 LCI)Facelift 2022M40i