Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63vsMG Cyberster 77 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231)

AMG SL 63

537 hp5461 ccGasolineRWDTwin-turboRoadster2012-2015
VS

MG Cyberster

77 kWh

510 hpElectricAWDAutomaticRoadster2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63

  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    537 hp
    400 kW
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,845 kg
    4,068 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    291 hp/t
    217 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    86/100
  • Best economy score
    80/100
  • Best practicality score
    31/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
537hp400kW
510hp380kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
725Nm535lb-ft
Curb weight
1,845kg4,068lb
1,985kg4,376lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
53.7s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
32.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
14.0s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
3.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
434Nm/t290lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
758km471mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
5,461cc333cu in
-
Length
4,617mm182in
4,535mm179in
Width
1,877mm74in
1,913mm75in
Height
1,315mm52in
1,329mm52in
Wheelbase
2,585mm102in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,600mm63in
-
Rear track
1,604mm63in
-
Trunk volume
241L
249L
Max trunk volume
381L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
75L
-
CO2 emissions
231g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63MGCyberster77 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
3.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.0 s
15.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
4.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
189 km/h
117 mph
186 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
537 hp
400 kW
MGCyberster77 kWh
510 hp
380 kW

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63 has 27 hp more than MG Cyberster 77 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63: 27 hp (20 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
MGCyberster77 kWh
725 Nm
535 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
MGCyberster77 kWh
1,985 kg
4,376 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MGCyberster77 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 634.3 s
MGCyberster77 kWh3.2 s

Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63 has more power, MG Cyberster 77 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG Cyberster 77 kWh and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63: 1.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
MGCyberster77 kWh
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
537 hp
400 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
MGCyberster77 kWh
510 hp
380 kW
3.2 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
241 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
4,617 mm
181.8 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63MGCyberster77 kWh
Power
537 hp
400 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
725 Nm
535 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
1,985 kg
4,376 lb
Fuel consumption
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
241 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
4,617 mm
181.8 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,329 mm
52.3 in
Range score
758 km
471 mi
-
CO2 score
231 g/km
-
Trunk score
241 L
8.5 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63
Consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,599 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63

  • Has 27 hp more
  • Has 75 Nm more
  • Is 140 kg lighter
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

MG Cyberster 77 kWh

  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63
MG Cyberster 77 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) AMG SL 63 vs MG Cyberster 77 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster