Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 KompressorvsMercedes-Benz SL (R107) · Facelift 1985 560 SL CAT V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R107) · Facelift 1985
560 SL CAT V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score82/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) Facelift 1985 560 SL CAT V8
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque373 Nm275 lb-ft
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,715kg3,781lb |
| Gross weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,945kg4,288lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.5s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 576km358mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 5,547cc338cu in |
| Length | 3,995mm157in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 1,715mm68in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,284mm51in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,455mm97in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,465mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,466mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 348L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) Facelift 1985 560 SL CAT V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,800 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 4,750 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.5 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 230 hp 172 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) Facelift 1985 560 SL CAT V8 has 38 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor and Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) Facelift 1985 560 SL CAT V8: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 7.7 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) Facelift 1985 560 SL CAT V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 200 Kompressor | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985560 SL CAT V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 576 km 358 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 200 Kompressor
- Is 465 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) Facelift 1985 560 SL CAT V8
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 103 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























