Volvo V70 III
Car comparison
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5vsMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010
R 350 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,806 kg3,982 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions195 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,806kg3,982lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Gross weight | 2,410kg5,313lb | 2,840kg6,261lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 672km418mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,823mm190in | 4,922mm194in |
| Width | - | 1,922mm76in |
| Height | 1,547mm61in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,816mm111in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,661mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 151mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,950L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | 279g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,980 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 has 32 hp more than Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 8.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 has more power, Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 833 km 518 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 672 km 418 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 8.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,806 kg 3,982 lb | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 672 km 418 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | 279 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 | Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Is 299 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 84 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6
- Has 32 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























