Car comparison

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6vsMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon

3.2 JTS V6

260 hp3195 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2007-2010
VS

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010

R 350 V6

272 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6

  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.9 L/100 km
    19.8 mpg US
    23.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.1 L/100 km
    14.6 mpg US
    17.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    279 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    672 km
    418 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    242 km/h
    150 mph
  • Lightest
    1,680 kg
    3,704 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    155 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
Power
260hp194kW
272hp203kW
Torque
322Nm237lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
2,105kg4,641lb
Gross weight
2,230kg4,916lb
2,840kg6,261lb
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
90.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
566km351mi
Calculated
672km418mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,195cc195cu in
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,660mm183in
4,922mm194in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,922mm76in
Height
1,422mm56in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,578mm62in
1,661mm65in
Rear track
1,555mm61in
1,651mm65in
Trunk volume
445L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,235L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
80L
CO2 emissions
288g/km
279g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6PowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V66,300 rpm4,500 rpm6,550 rpm
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V66,000 rpm2,400-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
35.7 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 has 12 hp more than Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
2,105 kg
4,641 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
242 km/h
150 mph
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 has more power, Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
260 hp
194 kW
7.3 s
242 km/h
150 mph
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
272 hp
203 kW
8.3 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
7.3 s
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
322 Nm
237 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.3 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
Fuel consumption
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,422 mm
56.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
566 km
351 mi
672 km
418 mi
CO2 score
288 g/km
279 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6
Consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.35 LC100 km20.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.36 LC100 mi33.51 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,203 LC/year3,124 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6

  • Is 425 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 107 km (66 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 105 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 9 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) R 350 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 3.2 JTS V6 vs Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster