Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 V6vsVolvo XC70 II 3.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010

R 350 V6

272 hp3498 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2010-2012
VS

Volvo XC70 II

3.0 T6

285 hp2953 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2008-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Most powerful
    285 hp
    213 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,769 kg
    3,900 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    269 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    575 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Power
272hp203kW
285hp213kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,105kg4,641lb
1,769kg3,900lb
Gross weight
2,840kg6,261lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
90.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
69.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
35.7s
Calculated
34.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK
16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
672km418mi
Calculated
609km378mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
2,953cc180cu in
Length
4,922mm194in
4,838mm190in
Width
1,922mm76in
1,861mm73in
Height
1,674mm66in
1,604mm63in
Wheelbase
2,980mm117in
2,815mm111in
Front track
1,661mm65in
1,614mm64in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance-
210mm8in
Trunk volume
550L
575L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
70L
CO2 emissions
279g/km
269g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V66,000 rpm2,400-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T65,950 rpm1,500-4,800 rpm6,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.7 s
34.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
272 hp
203 kW
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
285 hp
213 kW

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 and Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
1,769 kg
3,900 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
672 km
418 mi
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
609 km
378 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
272 hp
203 kW
8.3 s
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
285 hp
213 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Power
285 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
8.3 s
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6VolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
Power
272 hp
203 kW
285 hp
213 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
Fuel consumption
11.9 L/100 km
19.8 mpg US
23.7 mpg UK
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,604 mm
63.1 in
Range score
672 km
418 mi
609 km
378 mi
CO2 score
279 g/km
269 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
575 L
20.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
Consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.83 LC100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.51 LC100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,124 LC/year3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6

  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 336 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) R 350 V6
Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 vs Volvo XC70 II 3.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster