Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 V6vsMercedes-Benz S124 · Facelift 1989 300 TE-24
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S124 · Facelift 1989
300 TE-24
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score75/100
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,840kg6,261lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.7s Calculated | 36.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 672km418mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,960cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,922mm194in | 4,765mm188in |
| Width | 1,922mm76in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,489mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,661mm65in | 1,497mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,497mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 279g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 6,400 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.7 s | 36.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 has 52 hp more than Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6: 52 hp (39 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 8.3 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 672 km 418 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 279 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24
- Is 515 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























