Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200vsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156)

GLA 200

156 hp1595 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2013-2017
VS

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper D 2.0

150 hp1995 ccDieselFWDTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0

  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,109 km
    689 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    156 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,360 kg
    2,998 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
156hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,430kg3,153lb
Gross weight
1,920kg4,233lb
2,030kg4,475lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
84.2s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
45.6s
Calculated
56.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
847km527mi
Calculated
1,109km689mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,595cc97cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,417mm174in
4,299mm169in
Width
1,804mm71in
1,822mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,699mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,585mm62in
Rear track
1,560mm61in
1,587mm62in
Ground clearance-
165mm6in
Trunk volume
421L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,235L
1,390L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
51L
CO2 emissions-
120g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 2005,300 rpm1,250-4,000 rpm5,550 rpm
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
45.6 s
56.4 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
156 hp
116 kW
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 has 6 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1,430 kg
3,153 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
215 km/h
134 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
208 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 2008.8 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.08.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
847 km
527 mi
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1,109 km
689 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
156 hp
116 kW
8.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
208 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,417 mm
173.9 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
Power
156 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.8 s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
156 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,417 mm
173.9 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
847 km
527 mi
1,109 km
689 mi
CO2 score
-
120 g/km
Trunk score
421 L
14.9 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km8.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi12.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal690 L182 US gal152 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,208 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 261 km (162 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 29 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GLA 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
GLA 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200
Cooper D 2.0
C 1.5
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
GLA 200
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
GLA 200
GLB 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200vsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
GLA 200
1.4 TFSI
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200vsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
Cooper D 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
GLA 200
2.0i
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200vsMazdaCX-32.0i
Cooper D 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 vs Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster