Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200vsAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
1.4 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score91/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,103 km686 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 84.5s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.6s Calculated | 70.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 1,103km686mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,595cc97cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,417mm174in | 4,388mm173in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,831mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,608mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,365L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 5,300 rpm | 1,250-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.6 s | 70.3 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 has 6 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 8.8 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 and AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 847 km 527 mi |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 1,103 km 686 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200 | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 1,103 km 686 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200 | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 1.4 TFSI
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 256 km (159 mi) more estimated range
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























