Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0vsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions120 g/km
- Best estimated range1,109 km689 mi
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Best overall score57/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,030kg4,475lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 56.4s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,109km689mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 120g/km | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 56.4 s | - |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,109 km 689 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,109 km 689 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 120 g/km | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 9 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























