Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220dvsPeugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range878 km545 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 181hp135kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,429kg3,150lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.5s Calculated | 38.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 878km545mi Calculated | 679km422mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,447mm175in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 219mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,482L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.5 s | 38.0 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d has 9 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 7.4 s |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 878 km 545 mi |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 679 km 422 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW | 8.0 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 181 hp 135 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 878 km 545 mi | 679 km 422 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d | Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 220d
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Is 111 kg lighter
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























