Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200dvsPeugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 2008 II
1.2 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score42/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,023 km636 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 130hp97kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,752kg3,862lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 66.0s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 981km609mi Calculated | 1,023km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,300mm169in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,605mm103in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 405L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,467L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 66.0 s | - |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 130 hp 97 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d has 20 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 198 km/h 123 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 8.9 s |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d and Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 981 km 609 mi |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 1,023 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 130 hp 97 kW | 9.1 s | 198 km/h 123 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | Peugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 130 hp 97 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 198 km/h 123 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 981 km 609 mi | 1,023 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d | Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Peugeot 2008 II 1.2 PureTech
- Is 390 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























