Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200vsVolkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan III
1.5 eTSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score42/100
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,616kg3,563lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.4s Calculated | 56.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 589km366mi Calculated | 859km534mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,539mm179in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,859mm73in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,676mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,582mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 652L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,650L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.4 s | 56.0 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 has 13 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 589 km 366 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 859 km 534 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 eTSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,616 kg 3,563 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 589 km 366 mi | 859 km 534 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 eTSI
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 270 km (168 mi) more estimated range
- Has 227 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























