Skoda Superb IV
Car comparison
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,781 kg3,926 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk645 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,781kg3,926lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,300kg5,071lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 100.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,912mm193in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,481mm58in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 645L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,795L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 27 hp more than Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 1,781 kg 3,926 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 5.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,781 kg 3,926 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 645 L 22.8 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
- Is 534 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 165 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























