Car comparison

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb IV

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2024-present
VS

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    645 L
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Lightest
    1,641 kg
    3,618 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    171 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    904 km
    562 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
265hp198kW
280hp209kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,781kg3,926lb
1,641kg3,618lb
Gross weight
2,300kg5,071lb
2,240kg4,938lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
100.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
96.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
23.1s
Calculated
22.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
825km513mi
Calculated
904km562mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,912mm193in
4,862mm191in
Width
1,849mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,481mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,580mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,581mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
138mm5in
Trunk volume
645L
563L
Max trunk volume
1,795L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5,100-6,500 rpm1,700-5,600 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.1 s
22.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.6 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
163 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI has 15 hp more than Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
1,781 kg
3,926 lb
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,641 kg
3,618 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI5.6 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5.6 s

Although Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI has more power, Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
825 km
513 mi
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
904 km
562 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.6 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,781 kg
3,926 lb
1,641 kg
3,618 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
825 km
513 mi
904 km
562 mi
Trunk score
645 L
22.8 cu ft
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 82 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 140 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201945 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)3.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
76 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIE5 Sportback76 kWh
2.0 TSI
83 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Sportback e-tron (GH)83 kWh
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 20233.0 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
60 60 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
2.0 TSI
70 70 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel S70 70 kWh
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster