Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023
VS

Skoda Superb IV

2.0 TSI

265 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,656 kg
    3,651 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    169 hp/t
    126 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    930 km
    578 mi
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
280hp209kW
265hp198kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,656kg3,651lb
1,781kg3,926lb
Gross weight
2,270kg5,004lb
2,300kg5,071lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
93.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
100.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
22.1s
Calculated
23.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.2s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.7s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
930km578mi
Calculated
825km513mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,866mm192in
4,912mm193in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,849mm73in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,481mm58in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
138mm5in
Trunk volume
563L
645L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
1,795L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI5,100-6,500 rpm2,000-4,900 rpm6,750 rpm
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,650-4,350 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.2 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.1 s
23.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.8 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
8.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 15 hp more than Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,656 kg
3,651 lb
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
1,781 kg
3,926 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI5.5 s
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI5.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
930 km
578 mi
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
825 km
513 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
265 hp
198 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
5.5 s
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,656 kg
3,651 lb
1,781 kg
3,926 lb
Fuel consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Range score
930 km
578 mi
825 km
513 mi
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
169 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.42 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.00 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,864 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 105 km (65 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

  • Has 82 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202345 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
45 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201945 TFSI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)50 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
76 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIE5 Sportback76 kWh
2.0 TSI
50 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)50 TDI
2.0 TSI
83 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIA6 Sportback e-tron (GH)83 kWh
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 20233.0 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)3.0 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIS5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 20193.0 TDI V6
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster