Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
625 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2022-present
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsNIO ET9 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
NIO ET9
100 kWh
707 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2024-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
- Lightest2,465 kg5,434 lb
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score0/100
NIO ET9 100 kWh
- Most powerful707 hp527 kW
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk544 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | NIOET9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625hp466kW | 707hp527kW |
| Torque | 950Nm701lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,465kg5,434lb | 2,700kg5,952lb |
| Gross weight | 3,095kg6,823lb | 3,100kg6,834lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 27.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 36.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 385Nm/t258lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,964mm195in | 5,325mm210in |
| Width | 1,906mm75in | 2,017mm79in |
| Height | 1,492mm59in | 1,621mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,120mm123in | 3,250mm128in |
| Front track | 1,633mm64in | 1,731mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,648mm65in | 1,758mm69in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 544L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | NIOET9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 625 hp 466 kW |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 707 hp 527 kW |
NIO ET9 100 kWh has 82 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and NIO ET9 100 kWh: 82 hp (61 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,465 kg 5,434 lb |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 2,700 kg 5,952 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| NIOET9100 kWh | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.5 s |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 4.3 s |
Although NIO ET9 100 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and NIO ET9 100 kWh: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 625 hp 466 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 707 hp 527 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NIOET9100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | NIOET9100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp 466 kW | 707 hp 527 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,465 kg 5,434 lb | 2,700 kg 5,952 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 544 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
NIO ET9 100 kWh
- Has 82 hp more
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
NIO ET9 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
NIOET9100 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
NIOET9100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
NIOET9100 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)S 580 V8
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 580 V8
NIOET9100 kWhvsBMW7 Series (G70)760i
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8