Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,670 kg3,682 lb
- Best power-to-weight285 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Most powerful625 hp466 kW
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 476hp355kW | 625hp466kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 2,465kg5,434lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | 3,095kg6,823lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 35.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 27.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 285hp/t213kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 389Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 385Nm/t258lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,757mm187in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,906mm75in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,492mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,633mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,648mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 199 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 625 hp 466 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh has 149 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh: 149 hp (111 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,465 kg 5,434 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 4.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 625 hp 466 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 476 hp 355 kW | 625 hp 466 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 2,465 kg 5,434 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8
- Is 795 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 149 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























