Polestar 5
112 kWh
748 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2025-present
Car comparison
Polestar 5 112 kWhvsNIO ET9 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
NIO ET9
100 kWh
707 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2024-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful748 hp558 kW
- Highest torque812 Nm599 lb-ft
- Lightest2,500 kg5,512 lb
- Best power-to-weight299 hp/t223 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score0/100
NIO ET9 100 kWh
- Largest trunk544 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar5112 kWh | NIOET9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 748hp558kW | 707hp527kW |
| Torque | 812Nm599lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,700kg5,952lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,100kg6,834lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 36.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,087mm200in | 5,325mm210in |
| Width | 2,015mm79in | 2,017mm79in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,621mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,054mm120in | 3,250mm128in |
| Front track | 1,716mm68in | 1,731mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,684mm66in | 1,758mm69in |
| Ground clearance | 149mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 544L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,128L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar5112 kWh | NIOET9100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 707 hp 527 kW |
Polestar 5 112 kWh has 41 hp more than NIO ET9 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between NIO ET9 100 kWh and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 2,700 kg 5,952 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NIOET9100 kWh | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 3.9 s |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 5 112 kWh and NIO ET9 100 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NIOET9100 kWh | 707 hp 527 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar5112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NIOET9100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar5112 kWh | NIOET9100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 748 hp 558 kW | 707 hp 527 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb | 2,700 kg 5,952 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 544 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 112 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
NIO ET9 100 kWh
- Has 179 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 5 112 kWh
NIO ET9 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
NIOET9100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
NIOET9100 kWhvsBMW7 Series (G70)760i
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 580 V8
NIOET9100 kWhvsAUDIS8 (D5)Facelift 20214.0 TFSI V8
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
NIOET9100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)S 580 V8
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0