BMW M3 (G80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0vsPolestar 5 112 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPolestar 5
112 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted302 km/h188 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Best power-to-weight312 hp/t232 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Most powerful748 hp558 kW
- Highest torque812 Nm599 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 748hp558kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 812Nm599lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 34.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 11.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 567km353mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 5,087mm200in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 2,015mm79in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 3,054mm120in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,716mm68in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,128L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW |
Polestar 5 112 kWh has 198 hp more than BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 198 hp (148 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 3.4 s |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 3.9 s |
Although Polestar 5 112 kWh has more power, BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 748 hp 558 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Polestar5112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Polestar5112 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 748 hp 558 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 812 Nm 599 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 2,500 kg 5,512 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 567 km 353 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Is 735 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Has 198 hp more
- Has 162 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























