Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 200vsSuzuki Kizashi 2.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013

E 200

184 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2016
VS

Suzuki Kizashi

2.4

178 hp2393 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSedan2009-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200

  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    908 km
    564 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Lightest
    1,494 kg
    3,294 lb
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
184hp137kW
178hp133kW
Torque
270Nm199lb-ft
230Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,494kg3,294lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
74.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
63.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
30.3s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
154Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
908km564mi
Calculated
797km496mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
2,393cc146cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
4,650mm183in
Width
1,854mm73in
1,820mm72in
Height
1,474mm58in
1,470mm58in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,598mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,614mm64in
1,575mm62in
Ground clearance-
135mm5in
Trunk volume
540L
-
Max trunk volume-
461L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
63L
CO2 emissions-
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200Suzuki Kizashi 2.4PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: Power / Torque
  • Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 2005,500 rpm1,200-4,600 rpm5,750 rpm
SuzukiKizashi2.46,500 rpm4,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200SuzukiKizashi2.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.3 s
35.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
184 hp
137 kW
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 has 6 hp more than Suzuki Kizashi 2.4.

The biggest power difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
SuzukiKizashi2.4
230 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
SuzukiKizashi2.4
1,494 kg
3,294 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
233 km/h
145 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 2008.2 s
SuzukiKizashi2.47.8 s

Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 has more power, Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 and Suzuki Kizashi 2.4: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
908 km
564 mi
SuzukiKizashi2.4
797 km
496 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
184 hp
137 kW
8.2 s
233 km/h
145 mph
SuzukiKizashi2.4
178 hp
133 kW
7.8 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.2 s
SuzukiKizashi2.4
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
SuzukiKizashi2.4
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200SuzukiKizashi2.4
Power
184 hp
137 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
230 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
7.8 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,494 kg
3,294 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,470 mm
57.9 in
Range score
908 km
564 mi
797 km
496 mi
CO2 score
-
183 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
461 L
16.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 110 km (68 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 79 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Suzuki Kizashi 2.4

  • Is 46 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) E 200
Suzuki Kizashi 2.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
2.4
2.2 D-CAT
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 220d
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC
E 200
E 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 220d
2.4
2.0 TDI
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TDI
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 200
2.4
1.6 T4
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4
E 200
E 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 200
2.4
2.2 i-DTEC Type S
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsHondaAccord VIII2.2 i-DTEC Type S
E 200
E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
2.4
E 200
VS
SuzukiKizashi2.4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 200 vs Suzuki Kizashi 2.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster