Qvale Mangusta
Car comparison
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
CLK 500
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful322 hp240 kW
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score68/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 322hp240kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 425Nm313lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 83.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 22.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 559km347mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 4,966cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,190mm165in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | 1,413mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,497mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 276L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 5,600 rpm | 2,700-4,250 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 22.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 and Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 5.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | 322 hp 240 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | QvaleMangusta4.6 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)CLK 500 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 322 hp 240 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 425 Nm 313 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 559 km 347 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Qvale Mangusta 4.6 i V8 32V
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) CLK 500
- Has 35 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























