Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002

AMG CL 65 V8

612 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2006
VS

Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010

AMG CL 63 V8

544 hp5461 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2010-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8

  • Lightest
    2,060 kg
    4,542 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.4 L/100 km
    16.3 mpg US
    19.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    857 km
    533 mi
  • Largest trunk
    490 L
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    55/100

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    612 hp
    456 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    284 hp/t
    212 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
Power
612hp456kW
544hp406kW
Torque
1,000Nm738lb-ft
800Nm590lb-ft
Curb weight
2,155kg4,751lb
2,060kg4,542lb
Gross weight
2,530kg5,578lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
59.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
14.9s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.5s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb
Calculated
264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
464Nm/t310lb-ft/ton
Calculated
388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
591km367mi
Calculated
857km533mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,980cc365cu in
5,461cc333cu in
Length
4,993mm197in
5,106mm201in
Width
1,857mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,398mm55in
1,425mm56in
Wheelbase
2,885mm114in
2,955mm116in
Front track
1,581mm62in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,583mm62in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance-
131mm5in
Trunk volume
450L
490L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
88L
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V84,800 rpm4,000 rpm5,050 rpm
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V85,250-5,750 rpm2,000-4,500 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.9 s
15.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.5 s
12.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
183 km/h
114 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
612 hp
456 kW
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
544 hp
406 kW

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 has 68 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 68 hp (51 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
2,155 kg
4,751 lb
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
2,060 kg
4,542 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V84.4 s
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V84.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
591 km
367 mi
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
857 km
533 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
612 hp
456 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
544 hp
406 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,993 mm
196.6 in
Height
1,398 mm
55.0 in
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
5,106 mm
201.0 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
4.4 s
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
544 hp
406 kW
Torque
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,155 kg
4,751 lb
2,060 kg
4,542 lb
Fuel consumption
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,993 mm
196.6 in
Height
1,398 mm
55.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
5,106 mm
201.0 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Range score
591 km
367 mi
857 km
533 mi
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8
Consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km26.08 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.96 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,911 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8

  • Has 68 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8

  • Is 95 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 267 km (166 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 65 V8
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 63 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG CL 65 V8
AMG CL 65 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12
AMG CL 65 V8
AMG CL 65 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12
AMG CL 63 V8
AMG CL 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8
AMG CL 65 V8
AMG CL 63 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12
AMG CL 65 V8
CL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 600 V12
AMG CL 65 V8
AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
AMG CL 63 V8
AMG C 63 Black Series V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 Black Series V8
AMG CL 65 V8
5.5 V8 Kompressor
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor
AMG CL 63 V8
AMG S 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)AMG S 63 V8
AMG CL 65 V8
AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
AMG CL 63 V8
6.2 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)6.2 V8
AMG CL 65 V8
AMG SL 65 Black Series V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-BenzSL Coupe (R230)Facelift 2008AMG SL 65 Black Series V12
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster