Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 65 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C216)
AMG CL 65 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Lightest2,155 kg4,751 lb
- Best power-to-weight284 hp/t212 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score67/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 65 V12
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption23.1 L/100 km10.2 mpg US12.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range608 km378 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 612hp456kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 1,000Nm738lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,165kg4,773lb |
| Gross weight | 2,530kg5,578lb | 2,635kg5,809lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 23.1L/100 km10.2mpg US12.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 283hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 464Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated | 462Nm/t309lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 591km367mi Calculated | 608km378mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,980cc365cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,993mm197in | 5,090mm200in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,398mm55in | 1,418mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,885mm114in | 2,955mm116in |
| Front track | 1,581mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 65 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 4,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 4,800 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 2,165 kg 4,773 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 4.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 591 km 367 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 608 km 378 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)AMG CL 65 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 612 hp 456 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | 2,165 kg 4,773 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 591 km 367 mi | 608 km 378 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 65 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 25.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 3,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) AMG CL 65 V12
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























