Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
AMG CL 65 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,667 kg3,675 lb
- Best power-to-weight349 hp/t260 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.1 L/100 km12.3 mpg US14.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range672 km417 mi
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score70/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 582hp434kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,667kg3,675lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,530kg5,578lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.1s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 56.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.9s | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 349hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated | 284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 480Nm/t321lb-ft/ton Calculated | 464Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 672km417mi Calculated | 591km367mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,993mm197in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,360mm54in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,581mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 395L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 92L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 4,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.9 s | 14.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 43.7 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 582 hp 434 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 has 30 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 4.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 672 km 417 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 591 km 367 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 582 hp 434 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 |
| 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 582 hp 434 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,667 kg 3,675 lb | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 672 km 417 mi | 591 km 367 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 349 hp/t 260 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.97 LC100 km | 26.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.58 LC100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,055 L543 US gal452 UK gal | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,596 LC/year | 3,911 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
- Is 488 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 70 km/h (43 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























