Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209)

AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8

582 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2004-2004
VS

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002

AMG CL 65 V8

612 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,667 kg
    3,675 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    349 hp/t
    260 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    13.7 L/100 km
    17.2 mpg US
    20.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    19.1 L/100 km
    12.3 mpg US
    14.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    672 km
    417 mi
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    70/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Power
582hp434kW
612hp456kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
1,000Nm738lb-ft
Curb weight
1,667kg3,675lb
2,155kg4,751lb
Gross weight
1,980kg4,365lb
2,530kg5,578lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.1s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
56.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
10.9s
14.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK
23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.6s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
349hp/t260kW/t158hp/1000 lb
Calculated
284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
480Nm/t321lb-ft/ton
Calculated
464Nm/t310lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
672km417mi
Calculated
591km367mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,439cc332cu in
5,980cc365cu in
Length
4,650mm183in
4,993mm197in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,857mm73in
Height
1,360mm54in
1,398mm55in
Wheelbase
2,715mm107in
2,885mm114in
Front track-
1,581mm62in
Rear track-
1,583mm62in
Trunk volume
395L
450L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
92L
88L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V86,100 rpm3,500 rpm7,000 rpm
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V84,800 rpm4,000 rpm5,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.9 s
14.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
43.7 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.7 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
10.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.6 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
185 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 has 30 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
1,667 kg
3,675 lb
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
2,155 kg
4,751 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
13.7 L/100 km
17.2 mpg US
20.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
349 hp/t
260 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
582 hp
434 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
612 hp
456 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Power
582 hp
434 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
395 L
13.9 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,360 mm
53.5 in
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,993 mm
196.6 in
Height
1,398 mm
55.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Power
582 hp
434 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
13.7 L/100 km
17.2 mpg US
20.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
13.7 L/100 km
17.2 mpg US
20.6 mpg UK
3.9 s
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
349 hp/t
260 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
13.7 L/100 km
17.2 mpg US
20.6 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8
Power
582 hp
434 kW
612 hp
456 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,667 kg
3,675 lb
2,155 kg
4,751 lb
Fuel consumption
13.7 L/100 km
17.2 mpg US
20.6 mpg UK
14.9 L/100 km
15.8 mpg US
19.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
395 L
13.9 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,360 mm
53.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,993 mm
196.6 in
Height
1,398 mm
55.0 in
Range score
672 km
417 mi
591 km
367 mi
Trunk score
395 L
13.9 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
349 hp/t
260 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
284 hp/t
212 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
Consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.97 LC100 km26.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi38.58 LC100 mi41.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,055 L543 US gal452 UK gal2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,596 LC/year3,911 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8

  • Is 488 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 70 km/h (43 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 65 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 65 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) AMG CLK DTM 5.5 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster