Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C140)
CL 500 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight284 hp/t212 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score67/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
- Lightest2,080 kg4,586 lb
- Lowest city consumption22.1 L/100 km10.6 mpg US12.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 612hp456kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 1,000Nm738lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Gross weight | 2,530kg5,578lb | 2,600kg5,732lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 115.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 22.1L/100 km10.6mpg US12.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 284hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 464Nm/t310lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 591km367mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,980cc365cu in | 4,973cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,993mm197in | 5,065mm199in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,912mm75in |
| Height | 1,398mm55in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,885mm114in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | 1,581mm62in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 505L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 4,800 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 has 292 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8: 292 hp (218 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: 2.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 591 km 367 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 649 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 |
| 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 |
| 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C140)CL 500 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 612 hp 456 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | 2,080 kg 4,586 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.9 L/100 km 15.8 mpg US 19.0 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 591 km 367 mi | 649 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 284 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.9 L/100 km15.8 mpg US19 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.08 LC100 km | 26.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.96 LC100 mi | 43.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,235 L590 US gal492 UK gal | 2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,911 LC/year | 4,043 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 65 V8
- Has 292 hp more
- Has 530 Nm more
- Is 2.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 130 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C140) CL 500 V8
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























